For real estate investment trusts (REITs), standard metrics like earnings per share (EPS) or price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios may not deliver the most accurate picture you need of performance and value. Instead, professionals often turn to funds from operations (FFO) and adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) as key indicators. Understanding FFO and AFFO is thus crucial for accurately evaluating a REIT's financial health, growth prospects, and overall investment potential.
FFO and AFFO are tailored to the needs of REITs. Unlike traditional companies, they generate income primarily through property rentals and must distribute most of their earnings as dividends. FFO puts depreciation and other noncash charges back into the net income, giving a clearer view of the REIT's operating performance. AFFO takes this a step further by accounting for capital expenditures and other adjustments, providing a picture of the REIT's sustainable dividend-paying capacity.
Key Takeaways
- Traditional metrics such as earnings per share (EPS) and price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio are not reliable ways to estimate the value of a real estate investment trust (REIT).
- A better metric to use is funds from operations (FFO), which makes adjustments for depreciation, preferred dividends, and distributions.
- It’s best to use FFO with other metrics such as growth rates, dividend history, and debt ratios.
REIT Income Statement
Let’s start with a summary income statement from XYZResidential (XYZ), afictional residential REIT.
From 2019to 2020, XYZ’s net income, or “bottom line,” grew by almost 30%. However, the net income numbersinclude depreciation expenses, which are significant line items.
For most businesses, depreciation is an acceptable noncash charge that allocates the cost of an investment made previously. But real estate differs from most fixed-plant or equipment investments becauseproperty seldom loses value and often appreciates.
Net income, a measure reduced by depreciation, is an inferior gauge of performance. As a result,it makes sense to judge REITsby FFO, which excludes depreciation.
Funds from Operations (FFO)
Companies are required to reconcile FFO, which is reported in the footnotes, along withnet income. The general calculation involves adding depreciation back to net income and subtracting the gains on the sales of depreciable property.
We subtract these gains, assumingthey are one-time events and don't contribute to the REIT's long-term ability to sustain its dividend payments. Thereconciliation of net income to FFO (with minor items removed for the sake of clarity) in2019and 2020 could be laid out as follows:
After adding depreciation and subtracting property gains, FFO is about $838,390 in 2019and almost $757,600 in 2020.
FFO must be reported,but it has a weakness. It does not deduct the capital expenditures required to maintain the existing portfolio of properties. Shareholders’ real estate holdings must be maintained by repainting apartments, for example, so FFO is not quite the true residual cash flow remaining after expenses and expenditures.
Professional analysts, therefore, use AFFO to estimate the REIT’s value. Although FFO is commonly used, professionals tend to focus on AFFO for two reasons:
- It measures more precisely the residual cash flow available to shareholders, and it’s thus a better “base number” for estimating value.
- It is true residual cash flow and abetter predictor of the REIT’s future capacity to pay dividends.
AFFO doesn’t have a uniform definition, but most calculations subtract capital expenditures. For XYZ, almost $182,000 is deducted from FFO to get the AFFO for 2020. This number can typically be found on the REIT’scash flow statement. It’s used to estimate the cash required to maintain existing properties, although a close look at specific propertiescould generate more accurate information.
Traditional metrics such asEPSand P/Eratio are unreliable in estimating a REIT's value.
Growth in FFO and/or AFFO
We can estimate the REIT’s value more accurately with FFO andAFFO and look for expected growth in one or both. This requires carefully watching the underlying prospects of the REIT and its sector. The specifics of evaluating a REIT’s growth prospects are beyond the scope of this article,but here are some data to consider:
- The possibilityof rent increases
- The possibilityof improving and maintaining occupancy rates
- Plansto upgrade or upscale properties. Onepopular and successful tactic is to acquire low-endproperties and upgrade them to attracthigher-quality tenants;better tenants lead to higher occupancy rates, fewer evictions, and higher rents.
- External growth prospects. Many REITs boostFFO growth through acquisitions. Still, that’s easier said than done because an REIT must distribute most of its profits and typically doesn’t holdmuch cash. However, many REITssuccessfully prune their portfolios and sell underperforming properties to finance the acquisition of undervalued properties.
Applying a Multiple to FFO/AFFO
The REIT’stotal return is derived from two sources:dividends paid andthe appreciation in price. Expected price appreciationcan be divided into two elements:growth in FFO/AFFOand expansion in the price-to-FFO or price-to-AFFO ratio.
Let’s look at the multiples for XYZ. Note that we are showing price divided by FFO, which is market capitalization (market cap) divided by FFO. In this example, XYZ’smarket cap (number of shares times the price per share) is about $8 million.
Interpreting the Data
Besides comparing them with industry peers, how dowe interpret these multiples? LikeP/E ratios, interpreting price-to-FFO and price-to-AFFO multiples is not an exact science. Multiples vary with market conditions and the specific REIT subsectors. However, as with other equity categories, we want to avoid buying into a multiple that is too high.
Aside from the dividends paid, price appreciation is derived from two sources: growth in FFO/AFFO or an increase in the valuation multiple (price-to-FFO or price-to-AFFO ratio). We should consider both sources when considering a REIT with favorable FFO growth prospects.
For example, if FFO grows at 10%and the multiple of 10.55× is maintained, the price will grow 10%. However, if the multiple increases about 5% to 11×,price appreciation will be about 15% (10% FFO growth + 5% multiple expansion).
A useful exercise takes the reciprocal of XYZ’s price-to-AFFO multiple: 1/(price/AFFO) = AFFO/price, or $575.7/8,000 = 7.2%. This is called the “AFFO yield.” To evaluate the REIT’s price, we can then compare the AFFO yield to the following:
- The market’s going capitalization rate
- Our estimate for the REIT’s growth in FFO/AFFO
The capitalization rate tells investorshow much the market currently pays for real estate. For example, 8% implies that investors are generally paying about 12.5 times (1 divided by 8%) the net operating income of each real estate property.
Let’s assume that the market’s capitalization rate is about 7%, and our anticipated growth for XYZ’s FFO/AFFO is a heady 5%. Given a calculated AFFO yield of 7.2%, we are likely looking at a good investment becauseour price is reasonable compared with the market’s capitalization rate. (It’s even a little higher, which is better.)
In addition, the expected growth should eventually translate into a better price and higher dividends. In fact, if all other investors agreed with our evaluation, XYZ’s pricewould be much higher because it would need a higher multiple to incorporatethese growth expectations.
Where did the funds from operations (FFO) metric come from?
The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (Nareit), the REIT industry group in the U.S., created the FFO metric to better evaluate REITs. FFO is among the non-generally accepted accounting principles measures.
Are FFO the same as cash flow from operations (CFO)?
No. CFO is how much money a company generates from its regular business activities and is reported on the cash flow statement. FFO, instead, refers to an REIT’s profitability by adding depreciation, amortization, and losses on sales of assets to earnings, then subtracting any gains on the sale of assets and interest income.
Can I use FFO and AFFO ratios to compare different REITs?
Yes, ratios like the price-to-FFO and price-to-AFFO multiples allow you to compare the relative value of different REITs. These REIT ratios are analogous to the P/E ratio used for other companies. A lower multiple could indicate that a REIT is undervalued, while a higher multiple could suggest overvaluation, although context and other financial indicators should also be considered in any assessment.
What are the formulas for FFO and AFFO?
The formula for FFO is:
FFO = net income + amortization + depreciation - capital gains from property sales
Though there is no one standard formula, calculations for AFFO typically look as follows:
AFFO = FFO + rent increases - capital expenditures - routine maintenance amounts
The Bottom Line
REIT evaluation produces greater clarity when looking at FFO rather than net income. Prospective investors should also calculate AFFO, which deducts the likely expenditures necessary to maintain the real estate portfolio. AFFO provides an excellent tool to measure the REIT’s dividend-paying capacity and growth prospects.